Senate Committee Talks Texas Groundwater, Sept. 22nd

The Texas Senate Natural Resources Committee is holding a public hearing tomorrow (Wednesday, September 22) to discuss a couple of their interim charges (charges 1, 2, & 4).  The hearing begins at 8:30 in room E1.012 at the State Capitol in Austin.  Ken Kramer, Director of the Lone Star Chapter, Sierra Club has been invited to give testimony on charge #2 (groundwater management) at the hearing. .

The topics that the hearing will cover are the joint planning process for management of groundwater known as the GMA process and the financing of water infrastructure projects in the state. All the folks interested in groundwater will be monitoring this hearing to hear the latest opinions.  Representatives from the Texas Water Development Board, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, the Texas Farm BureauTexas Alliance of Groundwater Districts, Texas Water Conservation Association and the Sierra Club will all be there to offer their testimony on how the GMA process is proceeding and what, if any, suggestions they have for changing the process.

We have written before on the GMA process and some of the pitfalls that we have witnessed along the way.  You can read those posts here and here.  The GMA process is a work in progress and there are some components that have worked better that others.  It should be intersting to hear what groundwater professionals and others have to say on the topic tomorrow.  You should be able to view the committee hearing at http://www.senate.state.tx.us/bin/live.php.

Posted by Jennifer Walker, Water Resources Specialist, Lone Star Chapter Sierra Club

About these ads

One response to “Senate Committee Talks Texas Groundwater, Sept. 22nd

  1. My name is Bill Kendrick. I am a disabled Vietnam Veteran.
    Ever done something, and because nobody has done it before, nobody believes it can be done? Molecular structural change is one of them. Consider this, gas and liquid cannot occupy the same space, they will separate in the gas and liquid state. If you find the saturation temperature of a liquid it will turn to a gas. If in that liquid you have not reached the saturation temperature of another matter in that liquid, one of the matters will turn to a gas, and the other will remain a liquid. I have found a way to achieve a specific temperature, applying it to a liquid, extracting a gas, and leaving any substance in that liquid, whose saturation temperature has not been reached, that substance will remain a liquid.
    I have done this to gasoline. I get a white colored low pressure gas, with twice the power of gasoline. I had the smog analyzed on a smog analyzer, getting 0 parts per million hydrocarbons on a 350 V8 Chevrolet truck, running on this white colored low pressure vapor. In this same process I get a liquid, from the gasoline. This is an oily non flammable liquid, the liquid has a boiling temperature far above that of gasoline. Both the white colored gas, and non flammable liquid were made from gasoline using temperature, neither are gasoline anymore. See it running on a truck, You Tube, White Gasoline Vapor. Read everything, including comments. I have endorsements from 2 US Senators and 3 US Representatives to get a grant for lab work to prove what I say (copies of the endorsements upon request). I prove it, and the chamber seen on You Tube, making low pressure white colored gas, can, with fine tuning, and different controls, produce hydrogen from water, in the same manner the white colored low pressure gas seen on You Tubes.
    I know when I change the gasoline, to the white colored gas, a void is created in the molecular structure of the gas, because air is present in my chamber, I think oxygen fills that void, this changes the white gases saturation temperature, to a temperature far below the saturation temperature of gasoline, and creates the increase in the power of the gas. I don’t know without the lab tests, but I think the liquid I accumulate in the bottom of the chamber, the non flammable oily liquid, is a liquid carbon. I deduct this because of the 0 parts per million hydrocarbon reading I get on the smog analyzer. I just might have removed the carbon footprint from gasoline, and created a high temperature lubricant, like no other.
    Gasoline is not the object here. If the lab tests are right, What can be done to one liquid can be done to any liquid. With my process I will be able to find the saturation temperature of hydrogen in water, turning the hydrogen to a gas, and working in the 62 degree Fahrenheit temperature difference of the boiling points of hydrogen and oxygen, leave the oxygen as a liquid, not reaching, the saturation temperature of oxygen. I will be able to remove all the hydrogen that water contains within. My chamber can do this at the intake manifold of the engine. No more high pressure hydrogen fuel cells to explode. Put water in your gas tank. Get me the lab tests on the solutions I have created, and I could change the world, science for sure. You know when you burn hydrogen it makes water. Who knows how much water can be reclaimed after the burning hydrogen creates the water. Think what a Molecular Structural Change could do, for medicine, health, science, just to mention a few.
    Help me find a grant.
    Bill

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s