The report supports earlier concerns raised by Oklahoma officials about the potential impacts on their state from the nearly 30 coal-fired plants either operating, permitted or proposed in Texas.
- RT @amalykinz: San Antonio passed a climate plan yesterday, making it the "second major Texas city to adopt the goal of net-zero carbon emi… 40 minutes ago
- RT @SaveRGVfromLNG: 🚨URGENT! Take action to stop the Rio Grande LNG fracked gas project from getting a permit to destroy our wetlands! Send… 2 hours ago
- This is a huge victory for community advocates who've worked hard to hold the huge polluting company Formosa Plasti… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 hours ago
- See User Submissions section of Sierra Club’s Terms and Conditions at: the following disclaimer: http://www.sierraclub.org/website/terms/index.asp#submissions”
Pick a Topic!Air pollution air quality Austin austin beyond coal Austin Energy Austin Texas Beyond Coal Business Clean Air Act clean energy Climate change Coal Coal Plants conservation corpus christi Corpus Christi Texas CPS Energy Dallas Demand Response drought Electric Reliability Council of Texas Energy Energy conservation energy efficiency Environment Environmental Protection Agency epa ERCOT Fossil fuel power station Fracking global warming Greenhouse gas health houston Hydraulic fracturing ken kramer Keystone Pipeline las brisas LCRA lisa jackson Lone Star Chapter of the Sierra Club lower colorado river authority luminant mercury Natural gas oil and gas ozone pollution public citizen public transportation Renewable energy Renewable Portfolio Standard San Antonio sierra club solar Solar energy sulfur-dioxide Sunset Advisory Commission Sustainable energy tceq Tenaska texas Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Texas Legislature Texas Sierra Club transportation United States United States Environmental Protection Agency water Water conservation Water pollution White Stallion wind Wind Energy Wind power